A Growing Challenge for Independent Wealth Managers
For independent wealth managers, ensuring compliance is not just a regulatory checkbox—it’s a trust-building pillar. One of the most complex and critical aspects of compliance today involves PEP checks. Identifying Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) is essential in preventing money laundering, bribery, and corruption. While screening tools exist, the process is far from straightforward.
A PEP isn’t just a head of state or a senior official. It includes their close associates, family members, and even business partners. For banks and independent wealth managers, the due diligence doesn’t stop with the individual — it extends to their entire network.
Why PEP Screening Matters
PEPs pose a higher risk due to their influence, visibility, and exposure to public funds. Regulatory bodies such as FATF, FINMA, and AML laws across Europe mandate enhanced due diligence on these individuals. For independent wealth managers, onboarding and monitoring processes must be robust, up-to-date, and watertight.
- Heavy fines
- Loss of licence or Finma approval
- Reputational damage
- Client attrition due to compliance concerns
Commonly Used PEP Screening Tools
Many firms rely on PEP databases and screening systems to support the compliance process. However, not all are created equal. Coverage, update frequency, and data sources vary significantly.
Provider | Coverage & Highlights | Update Frequency | Source |
---|---|---|---|
World-Check (Refinitiv) | 4M+ records on PEPs, sanctions, and adverse media | Real-time for high-risk categories | LSEG |
Firco Global WatchList® | 2M+ entities in 240+ countries incl. PEPs | Regular | LexisNexis |
Accuity | Sanctions, PEPs & adverse media profiles | Regular | Accuity |
Acuris Risk Intelligence | 200+ jurisdictions | Regular | Acuris |
Moody’s Analytics | 2M+ global PEPs with financial risk tagging | Continuous monitoring | Moody’s |
LexisNexis | 230+ territories, frequent updates | Multiple daily | LexisNexis |
Dilisense | 57 international sources, real-time detection | Real-time | Dilisense |
OpenSanctions | Open-source coverage of high-risk profiles | Regular | OpenSanctions |
Informa (Thomson Reuters) | Broad jurisdictional coverage | Regular | Thomson Reuters |
Pipl | Identity verification with live enrichment | Real-time | Pipl |
Trulioo | Global verification incl. PEP & KYC | Regular | Trulioo |
ComplyAdvantage | PEP screening, EDD & sanctions checks | Regular | ComplyAdvantage |
Note: If any provider prefers removal from this listing, please contact . We will honour all such requests promptly.
Inconsistencies in PEP Detection
One key issue is variability between systems. Some tools rely on static lists, while others offer real-time data streams. One PEP might appear in one system but not in another.
This inconsistency creates a risk for independent wealth managers, who typically offer a more bespoke and relationship-based service than large banks. Manual checks, cross-database comparisons, and enhanced due diligence are often necessary to close the gaps.
Network Screening: Family, Associates & Beyond
Another layer of complexity is identifying the PEP and its network. Many family members and business associates don’t hold public roles but still manage significant assets. These individuals may transfer funds, make investments, or open accounts—all of which may fall under AML scrutiny if linked to a PEP.
The Role of Multibanking and Consolidated Oversight
Having a centralised view is key for wealth managers operating in a multibanking setup. Real-time screening tools that integrate across custodians allow for better detection of risks across all client assets, not just within a single institution.
A multibanking setup consolidates all client accounts across different financial institutions, offering a complete overview of liquidity, transactions, and potential red flags. Combined with robust PEP screening tools, this setup enhances compliance and strategic decision-making.
Compliance Tools Must Be Integrated into the Workflow
A modern compliance strategy means more than simply “having a database.” Tools must be:
- Integrated into onboarding and ongoing KYC monitoring
- Able to flag network risks and not just named individuals
- Updated frequently, ideally in real-time
- Auditable, providing logs of who was checked, when, and why
Independent wealth managers using outdated or underperforming systems may not only miss key red flags, but they may also fall behind industry standards.
Final Thoughts: Compliance Is a Competitive Advantage
For independent wealth managers, PEP checks can no longer be seen as a burden—they are a differentiator. Clients trust those who protect their reputations and capital, and regulators reward those who maintain airtight processes.
Wealth managers can position themselves as secure, modern, and globally aligned by investing in high-quality PEP databases, understanding network risk, and embedding compliance into the entire client lifecycle.