22Nov2025

The Real Cost of Private Banking in Switzerland

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the vapa Swiss independent wealth management blog are solely my own and do not reflect those of any institutions or organisations with which I am affiliated. These posts are intended to share personal insights and should not be interpreted as official statements.

Private banking cost Switzerland 2026 comparison showing difference between discretionary private bank mandates and independent wealth management fees.

Private banking cost Switzerland — an essential topic for affluent investors and UHNWIs evaluating whether private banks or independent wealth managers offer fair value. While the basic management fees may appear similar, the actual difference emerges once transaction frequency and hidden spreads are included. Consequently, 2026 highlights one of the industry’s persistent cost drivers: active trading inside discretionary mandates.

1. Average Private Banking Fees in 2026

Traditional Swiss private banks continue to apply tiered management fees, combined with internal product mark-ups and transaction commissions. Based on a realistic simulation at a leading Swiss cantonal bank (discretionary mandate, moderate turnover), the following averages apply:

Portfolio Size (AUM)Private Bank Fee (All-in)Independent Wealth Manager Fee (All-in)Cost Difference
CHF 2–5 million1.10% – 1.40%0.85% – 1.00%≈ 10% – 25% lower
CHF 5–20 million0.95% – 1.20%0.75% – 0.90%≈ 15% – 25% lower
CHF 20 million+0.80% – 1.00%0.65% – 0.80%≈ 15% – 20% lower

While the base management fee differences appear minor, the transaction layer — especially in discretionary mandates — often accounts for up to one third of the total annual cost at private banks.

2. Transaction Costs: The True Cost Driver

During a recent live portfolio of a Swiss cantonal bank, an actively managed discretionary mandate revealed striking cost dynamics:

  • Turnover: ≈ 90% per year (moderate trading activity)
  • Explicit transaction fees: ≈ 0.15%–0.25% of AUM
  • Hidden FX spreads and product mark-ups: ≈ 0.25%–0.35%

Combined, these components increased the client’s total cost from a nominal 0.95% management fee to an effective 1.35% all-in rate — before performance-based fees. In contrast, independent wealth managers typically delegate execution to the custodian bank at wholesale rates, resulting in lower turnover costs and fewer incentives to trade excessively.

3. Cost Transparency under FinSA and FinIA

Both private banks and independent wealth managers must now provide ex-ante and ex-post cost disclosures. However, independent managers are not tied to proprietary products or sales-driven incentives. Their performance reporting includes both explicit and implicit costs, allowing clients to monitor their net performance after total expenses.

See also The Swiss Private Banker’s Guide to Independent Wealth Management.

4. 2026 Cost Illustration (CHF 10 Million Portfolio)

This comparative illustration is based on a standard balanced portfolio with moderate turnover (approx. 80–90% annually) and mixed global exposure. Figures are realistic averages drawn from discretionary mandates at mcentralSwiss private banks and independent wealth managers.

Cost ComponentPrivate Bank (CHF)Independent Manager (CHF)
Management Fee95,00080,000
Transaction Costs (explicit + spreads)35,0000
Custody & Reporting10,00018,000
Total Annual Cost≈ 140,000≈ 98,000

This simulation mirrors conditions seen at a Swiss cantonal bank with a discretionary setup, assuming standard trading volume and no performance fee. The main gap arises from transaction frequency and internal execution spreads, not from advisory pricing alone.

5. Why Slightly Lower Fees Matter Over Time

A 0.30% cost differential may appear marginal on an annual basis, but over a decade on a CHF 10 million portfolio, it equates to more than CHF 400,000 in compounding savings. Therefore, even moderate cost optimisation can meaningfully enhance long-term wealth preservation.

6. Hybrid Models in 2026

Many UHNWIs now combine custody with a trusted private bank and delegate discretionary execution to an independent wealth manager. This model maintains institutional safety while optimising transparency and cost efficiency.


FAQ

What are typical private banking fees in Switzerland?

Private banks generally charge 1.0%–1.4% all-in per year for discretionary mandates, including management, trading, and custody fees.

Why do transaction costs increase total expenses?

Because each trade generates brokerage, FX, and spread costs. With moderate turnover (≈90%), these can add 0.3%–0.5% per year, especially at private banks.

How do independent wealth managers compare?

Independent managers usually reduce total costs by 15%–25% through transparent pricing and wholesale execution, not by cutting service quality.

Do private banks still offer value in 2026?

Yes — particularly for clients requiring complex lending or structured products. Many now combine private bank custody with independent management.

No votes yet.
Please wait...

Beyond the Bank – A Private Banker’s Path to Independence

Discover how today’s private bankers can break free from traditional institutions and build truly independent client relationships. This guide shares the strategies, challenges, and opportunities behind a successful move into independent wealth management.

Get Your Monthly Insights!

* indicates required


Please select all the ways you would like to hear from vapa.ch:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.