06Nov2025

Swiss EAM Custody: Why Growth ≠ Market Share

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the vapa Swiss independent wealth management blog are solely my own and do not reflect those of any institutions or organisations with which I am affiliated. These posts are intended to share personal insights and should not be interpreted as official statements.

Two young fir trees growing in the shadow of large, mature trees in a sunlit forest – symbolising smaller custodian banks striving for space and visibility beside established giants in the Swiss EAM custody market.

The Swiss External Asset Manager (EAM) custody market is dynamic—but it’s far from a level playing field. Smaller and boutique custodian banks often excel in speed, client responsiveness, and innovation during the onboarding process. They’re agile, client-focused, and frequently the first to respond to independent asset managers’ needs.

Despite solid momentum and niche successes, most smaller firms still struggle to grow their market share in the Swiss EAM market against leading custodians. In this market, UBS holds around 40–45%, Julius Baer 15–17%, and Pictet 10–15%, together controlling over half of the Swiss EAM segment.

This dominance isn’t because they’re aggressively signing up new EAM relationships. Why? Because these big banks are riding the performance and inflows of large, established wealth managers already on their platform. In other words, their EAM desks are experiencing organic growth. As the existing high-performing EAMs generate strong returns, those returns boost AUM, and rising AUM further cements the custodian’s share. It’s a self-reinforcing loop that keeps the most prominent players growing without even having to chase new EAM clients.

Rising Challengers

Rising challengers like Lombard Odier (≈8–10% share) and Vontobel (≈7–9% share) are gaining traction in the Swiss EAM market, especially among next-generation independent managers. Both banks have built dedicated EAM desks and attract newer firms with flexibility and modern platforms. However, their total footprint still trails far behind UBS, Julius Baer, and Pictet. While speed and superior service can drive EAM growth, lasting scale depends on the AUM performance of major clients.

💡 Insight: In this market, speed helps you grow, but only performance scales your footprint. The top custodians defend their share – often without lifting a finger – because the success of the big EAMs on their platform does the heavy lifting.

Note: All figures above are rough estimates for EAM/FIM custody businesses (independent wealth managers’ assets held at these banks). If any bank would like to clarify or share its actual number, they are, of course, welcome to do so in the comments.

No votes yet.
Please wait...

Beyond the Bank – A Private Banker’s Path to Independence

Discover how today’s private bankers can break free from traditional institutions and build truly independent client relationships. This guide shares the strategies, challenges, and opportunities behind a successful move into independent wealth management.

Get Your Monthly Insights!

* indicates required


Please select all the ways you would like to hear from vapa.ch:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.